![]() |
Bushnell 119600 field
testing history:
|
| August, 2005 (initial purchase) |
This cam has low resolution and slow
trigger time. The
battery life is about two weeks. The programming very easy and straight forward.
The price of this cam is in the same range as the Moultrie mentioned above. I
would choose the Moultrie over this cam because it just performs better.
This
company has a history of quality equipment and
instructions to go with it. It is super easy to program
using their instructions. We just wish the cameras worked as well.
We finally got our first pictures off this camera and were disappointed in the quality. The photos are very grainy. Note: The camera lost its date/time programming due to low battery or during camera change. These pics were from the week of 8/20/05 with the original model we tested.
|
| 9-10-05 | This past week we placed both of these Bushnell cameras in movie mode. The 119600 took 6 movies that were absolutely black. The 119900 took 3 movies that were extremely grainy and had nothing in them due to slow trigger time. |
| 9-20-05 | Both these cameras have been pulled from the field. The final testing along side a known good camera has proved that in all modes of operations at temperatures in the high 50s and low 60s neither of these cameras would function in a satisfactory manner. At this point, we do not recommend these cameras. |
| 09-28-05 | Update on Bushnell 119600 and 119900 These two cameras were pulled from the field and shipped back to the factory. The weather gasket failed on both of these units. Both cameras had a severe problem with the triggering circuits. Both units had a problem with picture clarity when and if you could get them to trigger. The 119900 had a problem with the IR function not working. On the 4th of October I received a couple of cards from the Bushnell repair facility that gave a repair number that could be tracked over the internet. This was really great and allowed me to keep up on the status of the cameras while they were being repaired. This would tell you things like parts on back order or repaired and shipped with a UPS tracking number. Today, October the 12th, both cameras have been returned. Bushnell replaced both cameras with new cameras and now we are going to be in the process of retesting both units and compare the results with the data from the old cameras. |
| 10-20-05 |
Update on the replaced Bushnell models 119900 and 119600 The in shop testing of the 119600 has gone well. We have discovered some issues with the 119900 concerning the IR triggering and this cam will be kept in the shop for further testing. It appears at least on the 600 model that the trigger time is extremely fast but this will be better understood once we see its capabilities in the field. The night temperatures are now in the 50s and soon next week will drop to the 40s this will give us a chance to see how this new crop of cams will perform. My phone conversations with the 800 number at Bushnell to gain some technical information was pretty much in vain. This very nice lady did her best to find the information for me but I still have many unanswered questions. Mr. Stephens the product line manager for Bushnell has E mailed me but we have not been able to hook up on the phone after several attempts. I will keep trying to find out answers to our concerns. We see in the catalogs these models listed and they are shown on the same page as two different cams the 119900 model and the (NEW) 119900. This is also the same for the 600 model. We want to determine exactly what has changed between the cams with an early 04 manufacturing date and the cams with a mid year 05 manufacturing date because there is a noticeable difference in there performance. The Spokes lady on the phone also explained that the new model 119700 was the same as the other models except it does not come with the SD card. This does not seem to be logical and we want to know more about this new cam. The trigger times for the 119900 are 2.5 to 4 seconds with the standard flash and 1 to 1.5 for the IR flash. Delay time is suppose to be 60 seconds but it appears it is more like 90 seconds. We found that if the battery level is down the IR flash will not work. Putting fresh batteries corrected this. The standard flash worked even with the battery level down. Prolong periods using the IR flash would probably result in lost pictures due to the flash not working. Compared to our first units these two cameras are much improved and will sense under most field conditions with temperatures 80 degrees and below. Standard flash is somewhat marginal and with enhancing software dark pictures at 30 feet are readable. Picture quality is still somewhat grainy but much improved over previous models. |
| 12-10-05 | This cam was returned to the factory due to weather seal failure. As of 01-10-06 this cam is still in repair and waiting parts |