119437c Night pics-as requested.

Crosshair · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:06 am

Cam is set to 2 shot burst and array set on "Low", only 12 LED's lit. Motion blur a plenty.

Jim Vokes NY · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:24 am

Man, they are all blurry! WOW!

wv-outdoor · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:25 am

I set mine out on Good Friday where I had a M-80 at and was hoping to get better night photos. I have yet to check it but with what I'm seeing. I may not be overly excited about the photos. Hopefully Bushnell will come out with a firmware update to fix this and the 476. Only time will tell. Thanks for posting

Crosshair · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:10 pm

Jim Vokes NY wrote:

Man, they are all blurry! WOW!

And grainy too! For comparison here are a couple of pics from the cheap $50 WGI W6XAC from this mornings pull.

Sometimes I should kick myself in the A$$ for spending money foolishly. I think now I would rather own 3 1/2 more W6's rather then this 1 437. However the 437 does have a lot more features and options if that's what you're in to :wink:

.

whitetail fanatic · **Joined:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:17 am **Posts:** 17

Thanks for posting! Do you have any night pics when the array was not set on low for comparison? Do you think that would help with the motion blur or grainy-ness of the night pics? So compared to the 2011 models, do you think they made the shutter speed slower, which would allow for brighter night pics, but at the same time they would be a lot more blurry (I think I got that right)?? I wonder if the higher setting on the array (more led's lit) would help with the grainy and blurry pics??

Anyone else with night pics from the 119437c I'd love to see any pics you care to post here or pros/cons you've noticed so far.

thanks

Jim Vokes NY · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:42 pm

Crosshair is there anyway to cut down on the close up washout? I some times have that with all my cameras.

Crosshair · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:40 pm

whitetail fanatic wrote:

Thanks for posting! Do you have any night pics when the array was not set on low for comparison? Do you think that would help with the motion blur or grainy-ness of the night pics? So compared to the 2011 models, do you think they made the shutter speed slower, which would allow for brighter night pics, but at the same time they would be a lot more blurry (I think I got that right)?? I wonder if the higher setting on the array (more led's lit) would help with the grainy and blurry pics??

Anyone else with night pics from the 119437c I'd love to see any pics you care to post here or pros/cons you've noticed so far.

thanks

Yes, tried the high and medium settings first and they were also not good.

Jim Vokes NY wrote:

Crosshair is there anyway to cut down on the close up washout? I some times have that with all my cameras.

Jim, I tried 5% VLT (Visible Light Transmission) window tint and it does reduce the washout but also made the pics even more grainy and reduced the flash distance so IMO was not worth the time and trouble.

hazelvillebucks · **Posted:** Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:34 pm

that is not good.motion blur is a killer. my 466 started producing pictures like that in jan.but i got one of the few bad ones/'; right? the the camo adheisive from custom 1 that was just reviewed may help some cams. it did a great job on the pulse 10x, i have at least three cams that it will help. i sure hope bushnell gets on top of this. i am holding out for the x-8, the 119-327, will it be the knight in shinning armour. it looks like the advice to buy the proven is the best route to go. for me that is the 466 that everyone else has, the 446, and the 119-325. truly hazelvillebucks

wvhunter · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 8:02 am

Wonder why the difference between these pics and the ones luv2hunt8 posted in this topic.
http://www.chasingame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=27106

slay · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 8:23 am

wvhunter wrote:

Wonder why the difference between these pics and the ones luv2hunt8 posted in this topic.
http://www.chasingame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=27106

I believe the difference was because he had the LED's set on high setting? It must make a big difference cause 12 led's seems awfully dim to me.

That $50 WGI cam takes a great pic by the way....

Crosshair · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 12:00 pm

wvhunter wrote:

Wonder why the difference between these pics and the ones luv2hunt8 posted in this topic.
http://www.chasingame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=27106

There is also a street light shining down on the left side of the pics.

rat trapper · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 2:34 pm

I like the pictures I got out of the first pull from my Bushnell 436C. Only time will tell, but so far I'm liking my new Bushnell 436's.

Crosshair · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 3:17 pm

For only $30 more than a 436 I'd have to go with another 466. I now wish I'd bought another 466 instead of this 437 :cry:

. I do think this 437 will work better than the 466 under heavy canopy by producing brighter day pics/vids.

NantucketShedHunter · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 3:19 pm

That's the only thing I hate about my 466. It takes horribly dark pictures under any kind of canopy.

wvhunter · **Posted:** Tue May 01, 2012 5:51 pm

Crosshair wrote:

wvhunter wrote:

Wonder why the difference between these pics and the ones luv2hunt8 posted in this topic.
http://www.chasingame.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=27106

There is also a street light shining down on the left side of the pics.

Not in the game pics later in the topic

Chasingame.com discussion forum

119437c Night pics-as requested.

Who is online

Login Register	FAQ Search
	It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 9:17 pm