First of all both of these cameras were mounted on a multicamera stand facing directly at the feeder and centered on the feeder.
The two photos below are of the same event. This allows us to compare them easily.
In the 3 days these cameras were competing the Bushnell took more than twice as many photos as the Excite and most subjects were centered in the frame.
The results are interesting. I left the size of these at 1024x768 so the you could compare the quality a bit better even though it causes you to have to scroll. They are still at 1/2 the original size !
1) The Cudde appears to zoomed in (?), the camera board is canted to the left (poor QA at Non Typical). Pic quality is excellent, Flash is good.
2) Bushnell is grainy, flash has similar penetration. Note the buck in the back is less recognisable in the Bushnell (Horns are not as distinct). A little bit of the saucer eyes on these as well.
2006 Cuddeback Excite:
2006 Bushnell 119300 IR (using Std Flash):
AnthonyTrail Camera Review
: http://www.chasingame.comOur store front
: http://shop.chasingame.comScouting Assistant Software:
Disclaimer: For those who do not understand any of my posts, I have good intentions so plz do not take it the wrong way. If in doubt, just pm me. Seems I am considered "unpolished" when it comes to "talking nice & politely"