|
Bushnell Trophy Camera 2010
8 MP 32 count IR red flash digital camera 02-06-2010
07-24-2010
Important notice: This review is good for early
release cameras released and shipped prior to May 2010.
Click the following link to get updated info on latest
shipping models:
TrophyCam XLT REVISIT
This camera comes in three versions which are the 119455C brown with 2”
view screen, 119445C camo Bone Collector with
black and white text LCD, and the 119435C brown with
black and white text LCD. For the purpose of this review
we will only test this camera as a single review because
all cameras have the same specifications with view
screen and case color being the only differences. Should
a particular sub model have its own issue we will
associate the problem to that model only.
The look suggests a very solid small well constructed case with the main
obvious difference is the size of the IR array. We do
like the brown color which has proved itself hard to see
against most backgrounds. The somewhat lighter in color
camo appearance of the Bone Collector should work well
also. New addition this year is the increased strap loop
size to accommodate a Python Cable for security. This
would only secure the camera to the tree but the door
could still be opened so a small lock would be needed to
secure the door to keep the memory card from getting
legs. Bushnell now has designed a security box which is
offered as an accessory. The case locks up tightly and
will keep the weather out. The built in cable loops are
high on the back which might prevent a cam cable wrap
around type mounting because they are located in the
area of the array. The external battery port is the same
and requires the plug to be removed to access the inside
of the camera. The tri pod insert feature was also
carried over to this years models which is a nice
feature, and will allow the use of another accessory
they call the 119652C deluxe tree bracket. Inside on the
119455C the appearance is basically the same as last
year except for the larger view screen. I would like to
see the battery compartment marked with battery polarity
to solve confusion. The battery installation is briefly
discussed in the manual. These are just very good
looking cameras.
Inside the box is the camera of course but there is also the strap, USB
cable, video cable and instruction manual. I called it a
box but it actually comes in a bubble pack this year.
This is supposed to allow for close inspection by the
buyer prior to purchase. Reading the manual was easy and
very understandable.
The camera is the same size as last year (5.5 X 3.5 X 2.5) inch which
makes it possible to carry a bunch of these cameras
along with a sack full of batteries and cards in a small
day pack. About as tall as a coke can these cameras can
be hidden in some very small places which take that
foreign object in the animal’s environment out of the
negative things larger cameras cause.
The larger array to greatly improve flash range and the boost to the SD
card size (16 gig) are two of the main upgrades. The
new image processor and larger view screen will aid in
the picture quality/viewing area. Security was addressed
with the built in cable loops on the back of the camera.
Last year we could only program up to 5 MP but this year the resolution
goes from 3, 5, up to an interpolated 8 MP. Video is
offered in three settings of 320X240, 640X480, and
720X480 all at 30 fps. With the higher grade flash the
picture quality should be much better for the IR night
pictures. There appears to be a slight zoom effect in
the pictures so the FOV will be a little smaller. Once
up and running I decided to check the exact FOV of the
PIR vs. the camera. Because of the dim function light,
it was very hard to get the exact measurements. I called
Anthony and we paired up and had that task done in about
an hour. The test distance was at 20 feet and the camera
FOV was 15 feet and the PIR sensor FOV was picking up a
17 foot area. This gives a dead zone of about 1 foot on
each side of the cameras field of view. Most would feel
that that would be acceptable as long as your setup was
done with proper aim to your target area. They got slick
with us and pulled the EXIF data off so we could not
read the camera type this year. With everything lined up
I went ahead and programmed the camera with the
time/date and selected the functions I needed. All this
was very easy to do but don’t forget to hit the OK each
time after you make your selection and then menu to
exit. Internally there is a new board that is a Keep
Time manufacturing’s first. Gone is the Boly Media board
from last year but the case is about the same except for
the cutout for the larger array and python strap hole on
the back.
I started off setting at 8 MP (interpolated 5) and adjusted the delay
down to 6 seconds that way I don’t crowd the card during
write time. I had to go around several times to get the
info strip turned on because I failed to hit the ok
prior to advancing to the next selection. Once this old
man got hitting ok through his head the programming went
very easy. I did a few walk tests and got a bunch of
pictures to view and tried the built in viewer and that
worked great but I still prefer using a computer and
card reader to blow things up where tired old eyes can
catch the details. The multi shot 3 worked very well but
I returned to the single picture to go ahead with the
tests.
Fired up and turned on I went ahead and drowned the cam and pulled it
out and toweled of the outside and opened it up and all
was dry. The drop tests to the ground (about the same as
being knocked of an ATV rack) did not dislodge the
batteries or cause any apparent damage. With the cam put
in the ready mode I moved it into a light compromising
situation to get the filter to move to test the filter
clunk noise. Not anywhere near the racket produced by
other cams like Stealth and Moultrie tested last year
this cam was audible but hard for me to hear at 2 feet.
This probably means that most animals would still hear
it at a greater distance so your setup needs to be
further away 10-20 feet so the ambient noise would
cancel this slight clunk out.
Moved on to the flash/sensing range we tested at 45 degrees and found a
60 foot detection range was fairly common. The flash
pushed out past 50 feet. Being this has to be done in
the dark we managed to pick up the wrong camera and
actually did the flash range tests with last years BTC
which was discovered once we looked at the pictures and
could see the old style information strip at the bottom
of the pictures. Out the door again for another round of
testing and this time the proper cameras were tested.
Just prior to this round of testing we had kept one
camera fired up and facing the wall for about 5 hours.
This was so we could sneak up on it and test for “sleep
mode” which we did not find. The Trigger time is longer
that the advertised 1 second but as of now we do not
have the official time which will be done tomorrow. We
got to the trigger time tests and found they are the
same time with and without flash. The results were 1.5
seconds and that’s a full half second slower than the
advertised time.
We are paying close attention to picture quality and so far we have some
results.
Our 119435 came from a special order I had with Cabelas so we could do
our usual comparison tests. We have added a contrast
plate to our testing range but this morning I went ahead
and did a little informal testing to see what black on
white looked like.
At about 20 feet all resolutions still had a degree of fuzz which makes
picture quality a possible area of concern since it is
advertised as being much better. A zoom in to the black
mark on a white background gives us a good measure of
the cameras contrast ability and the quality of the
lens/sensor capabilities. More testing will be done once
we put our purchased cameras on the test range in a
field condition. I will know more once we get the other
cameras powered up and conduct some side by side testing
to insure that we do not have a difference between the
factory sample cams vs. open market cams. The new flash
is much better than last year’s cam’s headlight. We
bickered back and forth but the pictures have finally
shown that the 2010 version may be a little better than
the 2009 but a slight correction in the 09 removes that
slight haze and they are pretty well equal, but the
final word is still out until we can get our purchased
cams in the comparison maybe this after noon or for sure
tomorrow. We have 8 other pre production cameras from
other sources that have to be attended to today so as
time allows we will get to this and have the important
details by tomorrow.
First impressions
With us being in the middle of some history that all started with a
small little old camera that everyone loved and migrated
through a saga of turmoil both here and over seas. Now
that the air has finally seen a calming of the ill winds
and the dance partners have gone their separate ways, we
are watching everything with some very curious eyes. The
part that separated and was divorced from the original
parent company is now the KT brand and they are the
suppliers of the Bushnell and other brand names. HCO
will remain with the BMC parent company which has all
the original patents. As we had to do last year with one
of the other distributors we have taken a very careful
approach to this years review because the situation has
changed three times since October of last year. We have
plenty of stock to work with but the variables between
units had us stopped for a while. I will say that the
good people at Bushnell are very much into having the
very best product out there and have taken on the task
of forcing changes to meet those goals. Last year we
witnessed the occasional slip in QC matters and with the
help of our reports things managed to get back on the
right track and the BTC gained a very good following.
The news channels that we have managed to keep open have
allowed for us to manage our methods of testing those
products and find the hidden slips that for the most
part may be missed by the average user. When the gasket
stuck and was ripped loose on the first XLT that I
opened it instilled me to become that much more
inquisitive as to my inspection. As it was, most things
were very much in place and an impressive package just
to view. Pre production units have those type of things
so it was not paid much attention but when I got to the
post production units I did take out the pad and SLR to
record those things I found.
Function and programming were somewhat solid and
assembly was above average. My market purchased cameras
definitely show a different hue to the pictures. Though
they are good in quality judging from the first two or
three pictures I think light metering may be an area of
concern because we see dark and light pictures from
camera to camera under the same light conditions. This
variable is small and would only be known if you had
more than one camera operating at the same time and
light to see the variability.
03-05-2010 Update:
First off let me apologize for dragging this out but we
began to see a situation that did not fall into our
understanding. It is normal for us to compare the last
years camera to the new item that is coming out. In this
case we started the comparison and right away we did not
believe what we were seeing. One way was to get other
opinions as to the phenomena. The other way was to
acquire additional units to see if there was a trend.
The base story was the 2009 vs. the 2010 Bushnell trophy
cam's XLT picture quality.
The advertised boost in quality seemed to be there on
some units. The problem was that when we zoomed in we
lost a large amount of definition on the 2010 unit
compared to what was seen under the exact conditions on
the 2009 cam. The additional units (thus the delay)
arrived and the confusion mounted because we could see
that the quality varied from unit to unit but the loss
of definition was still there. The normal picture
quality of the 2010 cam was more pleasing to the eye
(eye candy) when just viewed straight out because of the
vibrant colors. The drive that gained the pleasing
effect to the non zoomed pictures also caused the
definition to deteriorate when zoomed (as needed for
game management uses) so we will have to say that even
though the new camera has a "pretty picture quality" it
has lost the detail needed as was available on the 09
BTC. The additional emitters in the new flash did help
but for the increase count the range remained very much
the same. This is probably due to the amount of power to
the array which has been turned down to accommodate
battery life. A higher emitter count does not magically
mean greater flash though the spread of light may be
improved at close range.
03-06-2010 update: The pull for information
has been tremendous about this camera. One of the areas
that seem to be questioned is our comments about picture
quality. Let’s see if I can clear this up. The camera
that we have to compare this cam to is its predecessor.
We could have picked out a WGI or a Wildview etc. for
the comparison but that would not have been fair. To
clarify the situation is that this camera does have good
picture quality compared to many we have tested in the
past but seems to be below standards for its fellow
predecessor. I would be proud to have one of these
hanging on one of my trees watching one of our areas. It
is just that we must be very critical and being this
company does react to our reporting we should see change
as time permits. This is how our old friends at
Leaf River operate. The box looks the same
and through the year as the situation develops they
update the guts to provide a better product. This is not
to say that the original by any means of operations was
sorry it means that that small slight defect is seen and
corrected and would probably have never been noticed by
most unless we pointed it out. It is just making an
already great product better. With the Scoutguard family
this change is overnight where the KT family operates in
weeks but the changes are made in a timely manner. The
interest is high with this camera and many are watching.
Firmware changes with this style of cameras can happen
any time and if appropriate will happen as the need to
change is determined. Now we have another camera out
this week so we now will have another 2010 cam in
basically the same box to maybe use as a comparison
during these ongoing reviews. The change so far from the
pre production units to what we see in the cameras
shipped to this point is highly measurable in the
positive direction.
Because of the way this cam is acting during daylight we
have spent some time in several different light
conditions to evaluate the performance. In under canopy
situations where there is measured day light this camera
does very good and the picture quality reflects that.
But have it in a bright sun light situation or have it
in the shade looking out onto a bright sun lighted area
this camera goes to a near whiteout situation in picture
quality. White balance is off kilter. What most everyone
would say that having the sun to your back and
everything in front of the camera good and bright would
be the almost perfect situation. Under these
circumstances this camera falls apart and the pictures
have white areas where ever the sun is hitting which is
not acceptable.
03-07-2010 update: The more I use this
camera the more I have grown to like it but there are a
couple of areas that just seems to be wrong. In the case
of the Python cable loops being added to the belt loops
on the rear of the camera was first seen as a super idea
until we had to actually use it.
With
the cable in place the bottom of the camera just hangs
down way to low and requires shimming. Even with the
strap/cable combination, aim is very difficult and the
shim under the back works but does not seem to want to
stay in place with out cinching the belt to a very tight
condition which causes the welded inserts behind the
battery compartment to loosen. The trade off for
security is still a good idea but get ready for a fight
to maintain aim once you exit the area after hanging the
cam. Next is the over driven (saturation) of color which
is in the pictures. This is eye pleasing as was thought
under the same case with the old Cudde cams. In reality
if you stand at the point and look out at the cameras
field of view then view the pictures presented by the
camera you will see that the pictures are not in any way
a true representation of the actual look of the woods
and the degree of vibrancy. We feel that this will
eventually get tuned down by a firmware update in the
future.
03-17-2010 Update: It seems that the 5
weeks of pre release work has resulted in a number of
updates to this camera. This is good news and it shows
the commitment that Bushnell has to its customers. There
are still some more areas they are concerned about but
they are small and would not be noticed unless we would
point them out. We are going to give them a big “atta
boy” for their effort to stay on top of any concerns
that is pointed out.
04-03-2010 update: We received our final
full shipping version and have began to make some
initial tests. The company has assured us that these are
already in the stores and available. What we did not
hear is just how the early versions that have already
been purchased will be updated. The announcement of any
type of downloadable firmware has not been announced.
The first thing that most will notice is the addition of
the seconds to the time stamp on the pictures. Next is
the better adjustment as to how it handles bright light.
I setup in the shade with the sun to my back and looking
out onto a very bright sun lit area and performed some
walk tests. The results were much better white balance
handling without washout to the pictures. We have
retested the trigger times and they remain the same as
below. Further testing is in process so wait for
more updates.
04-08-2010 update: The final shipping
version has hit the woods and after a couple days we
have several conclusions. First off we really do like
the addition of the seconds in the pictures. The wash
out issue that plagued the early shipping version seems
to have been corrected and the picture quality may have
gone down a little bit when we look at the 8 plate in
the sample pictures it seemed to have lost contrast. The
next area is our camera seems to have a false trigger
when set on the high sensitivity setting. We now have it
on the hill in the medium setting and we will see if
things improved. The night time temperatures have been
in the 70’s so a setting of high should have been in
line. More to follow as we get further into this last
camera and do more testing.
04-12-2010 update:
We deployed into our southern property to catch a
little different type of action. We had been watching
the false pictures that we felt may be because of the
sensitivity settings. We were set up in the video mode
and there were empty videos but upon close examination
we could see a big old doe’s nose that was just at the
edge of the picture which told us that maybe a small
portion may be because of a little dead zone issue and
not the sensitivity setting. We will be watching this a
little closer and if necessary put a backup camera to
watch those left right zones to prove our suspected
findings. I do know if it is a dead zone issue it will
be a very small one because I carefully tested each
camera for this and found that the area was small
compared to other like cameras we previously tested.
04-12-2010 update
#2: Our “normal" setting on the sensitivity
resulted in over 2000 empty pictures (in three days)
that were snapped between 30 seconds to 8 minutes apart,
continuously until the card was full. The days are warm
into the 80’s and the nights are near 60. We will have
to try the "low" setting and if this fails then we
definitely have a run away issue with this camera.
04-13-2010 update:
We just received a note from our Bushnell contact who is
in China that this last camera with the run away issue
is not the final firmware version and that they are
presently working on a newer firmware. We have asked for
the down load but as now there is no word as to when
they will have it ready and even if they are going to
offer it as a down load. So we are at a stop at this
point until we hear more.
04-15-2010 Update:
After testing this latest camera in all sensitivity
settings, we are finding a "run away" issue. We
contacted our Bushnell rep and were told that this was a
known problem that had not gone into production.
We we informed that the image processing fix for daytime
photos and the addition of the seconds in the time stamp
have gone into production. We are just putting
this review on hold until we get the final version and
word back from Bushnell.
04-30-2010 update: We have had a note from
our Bushnell rep and it seems that there is a degree of
confusion. Our impression as to the last shipping
version of the camera was that it would have the seconds
in the info strip at the bottom of the pictures and
there had been an adjustment to the sensor to improve
the picture quality. We then received another camera
that was supposed to be it but we found a run away issue
on that camera. At that time we found out that in fact
that that last camera was not keyed to the final
firmware so one slipped by them and we got it. Since
that time we have also heard of a couple more run away
cameras but that is it. The confusion about being “on
hold” only referred to our review on that camera and not
anything to do with Bushnell’s production of cameras,
they are still shipping cameras as normal. It is just
that we now are waiting to acquire what is a final
production unit. They requested that we let everyone
know that there is “no known issues” and the consumer
need not wait for a later version of this camera because
they are shipping that already and have the best
guarantee to support that claim. I will go ahead and
purchase one more additional unit from one of the many
vendors at this late date and re write the final review
paragraph with the facts as I reevaluate this camera and
let that camera show what the consumer can expect. So we
are still going to have to wait until I can get that
unit in house and then into the field. Sorry for any
confusion but this review is on hold for a few more days
until I can acquire that new unit.
05-04-2010 update:
We sent out a request to one of our supporting vendors
to supply a random picked unopened XLT from his latest
shipment. This camera arrived yesterday express mail and
was as we requested. The initial inspection found
everything in order and no apparent defects involving
the hardware side of this review. Eight new cells got
its attention and things started to happen. The first
thing we noticed is that the date/time did not have the
seconds, so we ended up with another test camera at this
late date without seconds. This is minor as long as the
rest of the function works well. This should let some
people know that there is still cameras in the system
that do not have the seconds, if that is one of the
important features that you need on your camera. We are
on to the test bench and it looks like the trigger times
are going to be 1.5 seconds for both day and night with
flash operations. This evening we will get this thing on
the flash range and do a little sensing tests, then off
to the field to capture some sample pictures. We will
try to move as fast as we can because of this being on
hold and the amount of folks that have voiced an
interest in how well this camera is performing. We have
a ton of cameras in the system so we must move on to get
some information out on those items also. When we have
this camera placed with the sun to our back and looking
out into a bright sunny area we do see a little wash out
but it is fairly well controlled. When we first
installed the cells into this camera we chose the same
set that were in one of our run away cameras and this
camera "went crazy" (the array would flash continuously
while photos would not be captured to the SD card) and we instantly thought that we had
another dud on our hands. We pulled that set of cells
and found that the 3100 pictures that the previous
camera had taken in three days had depleted the
batteries all the way down and were near dead. With
fresh cells this camera was alive and working properly
but for sure these cameras do not like to operate on low
battery power. Sensing and flash range appear to be the
same and we are presently gathering sample pictures and
will be doing the battery life tests. This concludes the
tests on this camera with the exception of the field
tests and battery level monitoring. Next up to bat is
the Uway cameras which will be the fourth in a series of
the mini cams so we will see how well they do against
the HCO 560 and the XLT Bushnell. We still have the
Spypoint FL-A to put up against this camera. All are
going to be strong competition.
5-07-2010 update: We gathered the flash
range (out to 50 feet) and sensing range (45 feet @ 73
degrees) on high which is kind of low compared to the
sensing range we found on the Covert HR. One troubling
thing was when we had the run away camera, it took 3100
pictures in a row and killed the batteries and filled a
2 gig card. I know this is not a normal test for battery
life but does give us an indication that the 1 year
battery life advertised will probably not be met. The
day time pictures were alright and the night time
pictures were above average. Where this camera really
shined is when we hooked it to the Uway ExtendIR-B and
the results were as good as this camera’s regular flash
yet it was the totally invisible black flash. This is
pretty cool and pretty well matches the performance of
the HCO camera (560) and Spypoint. We are now going to
up the picture count to 3 burst and set a minimum delay
(6 seconds) on a busy feeder and test the battery life.
This review is closed until we get that figure and we
will add that finding to the report.
So far we have no indication of run away on the post
release purchased cameras.
05-29-2010 update: We have had this cam
going since 5-4 in a battery life test. So far we have
captured 5538 pictures and we still get battery full
indication. The red function indicator has burned out
and no longer works, but the camera still functions so
we will keep it going until the batteries run out. We
have not had any other reports of this happening, but
will watch to see if there is any in the future.
06-19-2010 update: Well so much for the
battery life test because this camera is toast. We last
checked this camera back on 5-29 and it was doing well.
We checked it today and when we opened it up it was half
full of water. Our first inspection could not see
anything wrong with the seal. Everything is soaked and
slimy so we will have to wait for it to dry out to
complete the inspection. Latches were fully closed and
the plug was in place so there is no reason for this. If
the plug had been out then the cam could have at leased
drained as the water entered. This is not good so we are
just going to go ahead and close this review. See
the picture below and the light colored part of the
rubber seal is where the leak is. With the camera all
the way closed you can see daylight between the seal and
the plastic. The shootout that was planned with this
camera up against the Spypoint and Scoutguard cameras
has been canceled because we just cant seem to keep a
Bushnell Trophy camera running long enough to even
complete a review.

06-28-2010 update: We have had our original
XLT running ever since we received it during the first
week of March. Last week it died, and lasted nearly one
hundred days on its first batteries. We had it set to
video on a mission with one of our black flash units and
the past month it has not produced anything color during
the day. We pulled the camera and the IR filter was
stuck and we gave it a new set of cells but the results
were not there. Now the day pictures are back color but
very fuzzy. The camera will lose its settings during
the battery change for some reason. One of the latches
is loose and it just flops closed and does not snap like
the other. This is the same latch as the one on the
above camera that caused the leak. It is too late for a
return to the store and the ten dollars it takes at the
CS right now doesn’t seem like a bargain.
07-18-2010 update: Some of the data that has
leaked out of the factory by a very nice little bird is
very interesting. We are again in the process of
acquiring yet another BTC from a source that will ensure
that it is as fresh from the factory as you can get. The
Review above and its data may not apply to this new
camera because we have been told that there have been
some changes that are far away from the 2010 cameras we
have worked with up to this point. We will perform a
full physical inspection as to hardware and we will also
go through all of our tests again to analyze firmware.
We have had this very same thing happen two times before
where review cameras specifications lasted until the
reviews were out and then the specifications changed for
the worst at the factory. We will see as we dig deeper
into this. In the other two cases the importer was not
aware of the change until we found it. We will see as
time goes on and that camera arrives.
|