Recently there have been some heated and extensive discussions about
flash and its effect on deer. Many tune into the outdoor
forums to get opinions on many things by seeing what others
have experienced with equipment and its uses. The different
types of camera flash are just one of those subjects that
seem to appear and then reappear on a regular basis. There
are some very strong headed individuals that will just not
accept anything other than their own opinion.
The variables are so many that a conclusive evaluation is just not
possible because of those differences. What holds true for
one area is just not the way it is for another area. Deer
are very adaptable to the different situations. We have gone
to our “wild” area with our back packs and sneak in with
packs of batteries and fresh SD cards observing all the
scent control after waiting a couple of months to do so. The
cards reflect the actions of those animals. The minimum
interruption to their environment using this method showed
that the animals were right back to their normal traits the
next card change using the same method of approach to the
deployment area.
Now here comes change one. Weather is now getting very warm and the
ticks are many so instead of that two mile hike on foot we
load up the old ATV and make the same trip and do the card
change and battery exchange. The very next time the cards
were checked we could see an immediate drop in picture
count. Everything remained the same with the scent control
except instead of sneaking in on foot we used the ATV. The
camera flashes did not change but our method of approach
did. Slowly we noticed a gradual increase in the activity
return after some time.
During those trips where we did not use the ATV some of the cameras were
changed out and depending on our current review status would
determine just what flash the camera now being deployed
would be. This also seemed to not make a lot of difference
as to avoidance to the camera areas.
Where we made mistakes and had a high degree of avoidance was just how
the camera itself was actually hung on the tree. When stuck
boldly out in the open the camera was found right away. The
tips and tricks of camera deployment, say to aim up and down
the trail. They also say to use available vegetation to
conceal its position with care not to cover the lenses or
PIR area. If the angle is too long and the approaching
animal has more time to pick up on the existence of the
camera then there is a better chance of it being found. The
elevation of the camera is also important and when in direct
line of sight and not above then the camera will also be
found. Many of the arguments about flash are more than
likely a result of some other things that alert the animal
to the camera presents than the flash itself.
First let’s do a short talk about white flash. There are many
things in nature that may cause what could be designated as
a change in white light and one of those is lightning but
simple things like the above canopy blowing allowing an over
abundance of moon light to hit some light colored
vegetation. We have found that the white flash is very much
associated with a pop when the cap fires the strobe. This
bit of noise could be the true reason for an animal to jump
rather than the flash its self. Again if the deployed camera
was more above the line of sight then it has a much better
chance of being excepted as being something in nature rather
than what it is.
The next advancement that was thought to be the greatest thing for
scouting cameras was the use of red flash. The
advertisements are like putting a picture of a steak on a
bag of dog food. This is eye candy for the human buyer more
so than a proven function. Where this type shines is when it
is aimed away from where human traffic is, it increases its
ability to not be found and taken by that human traffic.
There is no noise associated with this type of flash except
that some manufactures use a single camera which requires
the use of the IR cut filter to switch. Most have gone to
twice a day at dawn and dusk so this noise does not happen
each time the camera is fired after dark. We have probably
recorded more bad reactions to this type of camera flash
than any other. There again that avoidance can be decreased
by knowing the habits of the animal and deploying in such a
manner that its red glow is not so noticeable. Placing it a
little higher and back off the trail but well within the
sensing zone, seems to be more acceptable. The great feature
of night time video using this type of flash is also one of
the big things that causes problems because of the
fluttering red glow for an extended period of time which
makes it more likely to be spotted by that weary old buck.
The introduction of black flash was a big step forward and very
much a possible answer to many of the avoidance issues. Not
nearly as much deployment care is needed with this type of
flash as long as the camera itself is not smelled or
spotted. The popularity of this style has grown and we now
see more manufacturers slipping their wares into the market
trying to attract sales. There have been many who have
attempted to develop a camera and advertize that it was a
true black flash but were found out within hours of the
first sales. This is a very difficult achievement and it
takes a lot of research to develop and come out with a
viable product.
Then there is the flash called low glow. This is just a red flash that
has its intensity turned down due to the use of 940nm leds
or it is someone’s attempt at black flash that did not make
it. We would probably put this style third behind white
flash as far as possibly causing a problem. This style of
flash that is tuned down to just an instantaneous blip (and
not that long Cuddeback blip) has a high potential of being
accepted by many.
What has not been studied is the effect of the flash color. Would a
white flash camera with a red lens over it scare the hell
out of deer? Would a white IR flash camera fare better when
placed in the same area where a red glow IR camera was
placed? We see that the color red in nature has been used as
a warning by not only plants, but many poisonous critters
that use it to keep predators away. Could this color be the
problem rather than the flash itself?
The prolonged exposure to the outside world and their devices being
placed all over their environment have shown that the deer
slowly gain an acceptance to this intrusion into their
environment. With the popularity of cameras growing and more
and more individuals are deploying year around the animals
do begin to get use to this happening. Our hill test area
now has a population of domestic deer. They could care less
if you put ten red flash cameras or a purple flash camera
there. They will stand off 50 feet away and wait for the
person with the bag of corn to leave so they can gobble up a
free meal. This is not the case in our wild area and we are
careful to keep it that way because conduct different kinds
of testing depending on the area. Any intrusion into their
home place in most cases where it is wild will cause things
to change and it is usually a while before they return.
The opinions on the forums
will probably continue and the sides will be drawn with each
side picking their favorite style of flash but what is
true for one area is not particularly true for another area.
Those whitetails in Wisconsin may very well have different
ideas than those in Louisiana. The unknown as to deer being
able to see color spectrums has been researched but in my
book it still remains unanswered. The use of white IR may be
the way to go (cost wise) but until we do that research we
do not know but we do have those cameras and as time allows
we are going to try to find out. The black flash has pretty
well proven its style by many and is now accepted as being
the future. I would like to see someone take their favorite
white flash camera that they have been using in their area
and claim that there is no avoidance and put a red lens over
that same flash and record the results. This might tell if
the red color is having any impact on the avoidance. Until
we have more answers I am going to just stick to my favorite
red black white flash low glow camera with dual clunking
filters and monitor my herd.
Bill