|
Moultrie Camera Review Page |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Moultrie Camera Review Page |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Digital
Game http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Click here to
view a simple camera mount project you can do yourself!
|
2/25/06 -
Read This Statement to Moultrie before
Continuing! 10-05-05 update: We spent about 30 minutes on the phone with the tech folks at Moultrie this morning and we discussed the system operating versions of the cameras. The Game spy and Game watcher 100 cameras have had three different versions. The 2.32 v is the oldest and this was followed by the 1.2 and now the 1.5 versions. The newer cameras do not have the solar panel terminals on the outside of the case. They recommend that you use the rechargeable batteries and just hook the solar panel alligator clips to the battery springs and close the door. There is no software upgrade available by the factory for the older software versions. The customer service number is 1-800-653-3334 8 to 5 CST M thru F. 12-7-05 update: We had one of our Moultrie 1.3 cams that we had nicknamed the “the Moultrie Extreme”. The reason for this was that it had a tendency to be over sensitive and take pictures untill filling the SD card and run down the battery. Even though it would do this on occasion, it would still sense and take pictures of animals. On 1 December 05 I wrote a letter explaining the fault and returned this camera along with the letter for repair. Today is 7 December and UPS just brought me a box containing a new camera. It is not a replacement Spy100 it is a new 3.1 Game spy 200. This proves that this is an exceptional company and they have not only an excellent customer service they have a very good repair and return service. Another reason for keeping this camera company's products on top of our recommended picks. 03-20-2006 Update on Moultrie GS-100 and GS-200: The following is a list of things that we have learned by way of E mails, Outdoor Forums, Phone conversations, word of mouth and from our personal experience. I will say that the cameras that we purchased and tested seemed to perform very good until recently, we have had one of the GS-200s to show some signs of problems. (SD card lock and White out)
Most of these problems were discussed with a Moultrie management person and we were promised an answer by E mail last week. As of yet we have not received any word. Bill
Note: These sample pics are unmodified. They are original size and may take a while to download on a slower connection speed.
|
||||||||||||
|
Digital
Game http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Click here to
view a simple camera mount project you can do yourself!
Another Simple Mounting Bracket Idea:
|
2/25/06 -
Read This Statement to Moultrie before Continuing! This is Moultrie's latest camera rated at 3.1 MP on its highest setting. The three settings for resolution are 640X480, 1204X768, and 2048X1536 enhanced. The AVI movie setting is 320X240 at 10 seconds. Out of the box, the first thing that struck me is that the manual was just one sheet folded up. This took me back to my first encounter with the Leaf River. First impressions are often wrong because the programming is very straight forward and easy so the instructions were more than adequate. Having just over a 2 second trigger time at 80+ degrees says that this cam should perform very well in the field when the temps are 50 and below. No external solar panel terminals was one of the few things that appear to be a negative. The factory folks say just hook the solar panel clips to the battery springs and close the door. (I personally am going to file a small notch for the wires to exit) I tried the factory method and the case crimped the wires so I would be sure to take care and see that the panel wires exit the case at the bottom and are not crossed to prevent the possibility a short and of moisture getting inside the case. There is a little different switch/button arrangement between the 100 series and the 200 series with a big dummy button above the mode button that I seemed to want to push to change modes. We are looking forward to testing this cam and it should be chasin game this weekend (November 12, 2005). 03-20-2006 Update on Moultrie GS-100 and GS-200: The following is a list of things that we have learned by way of E mails, Outdoor Forums, Phone conversations, word of mouth and from our personal experience. I will say that the cameras that we purchased and tested seemed to perform very good until recently, we have had one of the GS-200s to show some signs of problems. (SD card lock and White out)
Most of these problems were discussed with a Moultrie management person and we were promised an answer by E mail last week. As of yet we have not received any word. Bill
|
||||||||||||
(sold by WalMart, dubbed the
Digital
Game http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
WW 100 (Wally
World) Moultrie Game Watcher 2.1 MP Out of the box this cam resembles all previous Wally World models. A plain black box and no solar panel terminals. When you open the case the only difference in appearance is the LCD screen which has printed indicators for different functions like battery condition and amount of pictures taken. Programming this camera was somewhat different than its predecessor but easy and the manual is easy to follow. ***The “Sure Shot” function that Moultrie has incorporated into this camera is a pain in the foot. It takes two motions to set it off. The first motion does nothing but if the cam senses a second motion the picture will be taken in under one second. Put on a feeder or mineral lick this camera will do a fine job. If positioned across a trail it would probably miss the first deer but catch the second animal within one second. This being the case aiming this camera up and down the trail would be mandatory. Flash range is good to 40 feet and the same as all other Moultrie's tested. Cost on this camera with tax was $106. The camera comes with the normal cables and a couple of small bungee cords. No means of security for this cam was in the box also. I am working on a new design for securing all of the Moultrie models and should have pictures posted soon. This camera will be placed on a feeder this afternoon and will have an old standard black DGS-100 Moultrie V 2.3 with it for a side by side evaluation. 08-06-06 Update: We had four cameras looking at the same feeder. There were two IR cameras and two Moultrie 100 cameras. The two IR cams took 150 pictures each and neither Moultrie took pictures. Thinking that we may have done something wrong, we re-programmed the Moultries and put them back out. One of the troubling things we found with the Moultrie (Wally World 100) was the LCD display. The new display has the numbers letters in a very fine script that is super hard to read unless the light is exactly right. This time we were sure that the “ready” indicator was on before we set the cam out. Trying to program this cam under a tree in the early morning would not work out very well unless you had a third hand to hold a small flashlight. We will have results to post in a couple days. This cam is definitely on its way back to Wally World for a refund. The over
night test proved that we must have had a little bit of dumb azz when we did
the first set up. 57 pictures and no white outs yet there was evidence of
the flash going off in the early afternoon. The pictures were sharp and
clear for the MP rating. We might hang on to this cam for another week just
to make sure that what we previously experienced was us and not the camera.
The test goes on. Part 2 of this dumb azz review will find both Anthony and myself going back to basic camera review school. The other DGS 100 that we were running parallel with this cam failed to take pictures also. Closer review of that cam found that we had chosen a very anemic battery which lasted long enough to turn the camera on, but not long enough to take any pictures. Everything has been put back to square one and the field tests re started. Of the group of pictures that were taken last night the flash seemed to do a very good job and reaching far out past the feeder illuminating small deer that was 40+feet away.
We have completed the review of this cam and our last (part 2) findings are that this camera has very acceptable pictures. The sensing ability seems to be on par with out Moultrie GS-200 "NV". The battery life seems to be somewhat of an issue. Our fully charged 6 volt lasted two days and we had less than 40 pictures. This camera will be a very good candidate for the old hook up the solar panel and run the wires out the bottom and close the door as we had to do with the early models of the GS 200. We are waiting for our rep to bring us one of the new Game Spy 2.1s to see if we get similar results.
|
||||||||||||
Black Moultrie GS-100 (Late 2006) http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
Plain Jane Black Moultrie GS-100 review (late 06) Basically the same camera as the Wally World camera tested earlier. I was curious just what was better about the Game Spy over the Game watcher. This model also does not have the solar terminals and programs the same as the Wally World GW-100. Triggering on this camera is different on this camera. When left dormant for a while with out activity the camera will go to sleep and it takes a 3 second window to wake it up but once awake will trigger within one half second, and after the delay will trigger again under a second if motion is still present. Every time I pick up one of these Moultrie cameras I have a habit of inspecting the seal to see if there is any defects. The reason for this is we had one of our forum members who had a Moultrie in a creek bottom and a flood came and the camera was under water for several days. The camera had no ill effects other than being covered with mud. Try that trick with any of the 06 Cuddebacks and see what happens. The 2.1 MP rating is in order for most tasks in the scouting camera arena. Properly situated this camera will handle most field tasks very well. Knowing the ability and quirks each of these cameras have a person can pretty well situate the camera in such a manner that it will perform well. We have always loved our Moultrie cameras and the way the company has supported its customers. There was a down period in 05 where there seemed to be many things that caused all the outdoor forums to light up with complaints but this company stuck right in there and kept replacing cameras until now days I rarely see any problems mentioned. This camera can sell any where from just over a hundred dollars to around one hundred forty dollars depending on the source. In high risk areas where there is a chance of theft many folks seek out the less expensive cameras and use some of the security measures mentioned on this site. This camera has features like the laser aim, no loss of program during battery change, front viewable status which we wished we could see on some of the other comparative priced cameras. Trigger time is under one second after wakeup and flash looks to be the same as the Walley World 100 but I will re do this test in the morning to confirm. We just have to get a set of field test pictures and see how good they are. Flash range tests show good flash to 40 feet and this 50 degree morning this camera would sense me at 40 feet also. The sensing range and flash range seem to be very well matched on this camera. As with the Wally world cam this camera has the hard to read LCD screen. The new fine print makes it hard to read in low light conditions like early morning under the canopy of trees. Once we get some test pictures the plan is to match this camera with the Wild view 2 and Bushnell 119200 if our Bushnell is returned from repair in time to do this test in a timely manner.
|
||||||||||||
|
MFH-DGW-4.0
(2007)
|
Moultrie MFH-DGW-4.0 (D-40) Review 06-09-2007 This is Moultrie's low end camera that appears to be packed with a great deal of high end features. In appearance it looks like the 05 and 06 cameras less the solar panel terminals. The addition of an external battery port is up on the right side of the camera which is covered by a rubber plug. When the case is opened the inside of the camera is removable from the outer case. The bottom rear of this inside camera has a removable slide plate to access the battery compartment (6 D cells) which holds the batteries very secure once the cover is reinstalled. The SD card slot is easily accessed on the front right of the camera. A well designed single switch will move you through the functions while a separate set of buttons gives you the up, down, delete and select options. A pushbutton on off switch is at the top left of the front panel. There should be no problems in the winter, even with gloves on. I did not find any problems with the water seal gasket on this camera, it remained in place through testing. All the previously designed security brackets for the 05-06 cameras will work with this camera. The claim of 60 day battery life is assumed to be what they call “normal conditions” meaning no extreme temperatures and probably using the lower rez settings. This is an area of high interest to most users. Trigger time (unofficial) looks like between 1 to 2 seconds and on the medium setting the color flash pictures were a bit grainy. First impression is that this is going to be a very easy to use and nice camera to have for the price. Using a large capacity 12v SLA external battery and a high capacity card (up to 4 gig) should allow some extended field deployments if desired. The outside pictures taken on the high setting at 0800 in the morning were still a little fuzzy but very true in detail and color. I would have no problem owning one of these as my field scouting camera with its $100 price tag because it will do just about everything that I would need. Flash range and sensing will happen tomorrow morning and trigger times will follow after that. 06-10-2007 Update: Did the flash range tests this morning and as advertised it is to 50 feet easily. The sensing range at 71 degrees this morning was 35 to 40 feet. We will get the trigger time tests and then to the field for all the movie and sample picture examples.
Note: One strange thing that I noticed. To simulate battery life I
installed a set of used batteries which gave a reading of 80%. The
camera would turn on but shut itself off before I could make it flash.
We are going to have to determine if there is a threshold of battery
strength which shuts the cam down. I installed one new battery which
brought the level to 85% and the cam worked just fine. Long term battery
life is advertised as being 60 days, so we will run the camera and
monitor the battery level to see when it starts to shut down. During
these tests I found that the camera when working would give me what
appeared (unofficial) trigger time of around 1 second. I did not
experience any of the sleep mode issues that were talked about in some
of the early news leaks.
06-17-2007 update: This cam had been in the field for
about a week and monitored closely. With a setting of low
resolution, the flash and picture quality with flash are both just
fair. This test will now be revisited with the high settings.
Daytime pictures are much better. Setting side by side with a
Stealth I-450, this camera matched pictures one for one as far as
sensing so us knowing that the WD series stealth cameras have always
had very good sensing this $ 100 camera seems to function very well.
Pictures were caught of fast moving deer crossing in front of the
camera. These pictures were blurry but show that the trigger time is
also very acceptable. Bang for the buck we find nothing wrong with
this camera. Back to the tree for the picture quality test set on
high. 06-23-2007 update: One thing that we failed to mention is the automatic sleep mode when the camera is idle for a period of time. It takes a couple of seconds to get the first picture then it is in the fast trigger mode. This is the statement from the pamphlet: To maximize battery life the camera "sleeps" when no activity occurs for 2 minutes when you enter the delay mode. It takes a couple of seconds (flash will be slightly longer) to "wake" the camera when activity occurs. ONLY AFTER THE CAMERA WAKES will game movement result in a picture.
|
||||||||||||
|
MFH-DGW-4.0
(2008)
|
08 Moultrie D-40 MFH-DGW-4.0 4 MP white flash
camera revisit review 08-15-2008 Being we did a revisit on a couple of the of the I series cameras and found that they fell on their face this year with some bad trigger times and some issues with the whiteout problems. I had a hard time locating one of these cameras in the normal system because they stay sold out. This morning I visited one of the stores looking for another item when they were stocking the shelves fresh from the factory cameras. I gobbled up one but had to leave it lying around for a while until I could get a Bushnell and another camera on its way to Anthony to do his part. With 6 new batteries in its stomach the cam fired up and allowed me to program it up in about a minute or two. With the function switch in the setup mode and a good long hold down of the on power switch I was able to use the up/down and select switch to get everything done. Back to the off position and the function switch moved to the auto position and the countdown started. Of course I had already installed a good clean SD card in the appropriate slot. I set the cam on the bench in front of the trigger time clock and with a couple layers of blue masking tape over the flash I did some unofficial trigger tests. All came out at one second and I about fell out of my chair with this good news. Now I left it set up and headed in for a sandwich so I could look to see if this sucker would go into that dreaded sleep mode. About a half an hour later I made my way back to the cam without it seeing me and waited for the clock to hit the twelve. The flash went off and the time recorded (Less than two seconds), even in the sleep mode this camera is over a second faster than those high classed Moultrie’s. This camera now has a couple years under its present design and so far seemed to function very well. The sales in this area show that it is one of the most popular cameras around. Wal Mart had 24 Remington Ghosts and zero D-40s The Ghosts have been there for over two weeks and not even one was sold. With the two second wake up time and the one second trigger for every picture after that makes this a very usable camera. Big black and ugly camera is the description one fellow who was asking to buy one from the store clerk who replied “you mean the Moultrie digital”? The fellow said “Yea that’s it” when the D-40 came off the shelf. I spent a little time with him and he became a programming champ in a very short time and he headed out of the store to the club to hang it on the tree. I think he just got a little of that addiction that has been rumored around the forums. I am not going to go through all the description and measurements because that is all in the original review last year. We are going to get some flash tests and sensing tests before moving to the hill for the pictures. For those potential white flash fans who are waiting to see what the Cudde Capture is going to do might just want to buy two of these for the same price. The cudde has what appears to be better pictures and maybe a little faster trigger but it has not been out there successfully for two years. We hope it is but we don’t know as of now. There is just not a lot of fast white flash cams out on the market this year. 08-16-2008 update: The flash range testing went well and the white flash reached well past forty feet. The sensing range is also forty feet for this 71 degree morning. Compared to the I and M series 2008 cameras we tested this year this camera has it all over them with the exception of picture quality. You could have a stack of these cams for the price of one of the 60 series cams.
08-27-2008 update: Well all you Moultrie I and M series cameras
that have a 2008 birth date you need to hang your head in shame. Your little
brother just put all you to shame. The pictures in our sample tests are
pretty good for a sub $100 camera. The official trigger time came out to be
around a second (2 seconds after sleep). Even when the camera went to sleep
it still wakes up and snaps a picture more than a second faster than its
more expensive siblings. This camera is being pumped out by some vendors for
as little as $69 and as high as $99 for other vendors. This means that you
could have two of these cameras and not put the same dent in the wallet as
one of those new Capture cameras. The D-40 also has more features and a
company that has stuck behind their products. We are very happy with this
camera and it will be added to our stack of long term cameras to hold a spot
in our inventory of cameras that will stay in the woods.
|
||||||||||||
|
I40 IR flash 4.0 MP (2007) http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Security: I made a 7 ½ X ¾ X 1/8 inch bar (see picture) and drilled a hole in each end to slip a Python cable through and it appears that this will work just fine for most security situations:
Side view with battery plate removed.
SD card and accessories cables plug in here:
1/2 inch piece of 2X4
cut to a length of 4 3/4 inches and beveled on the end to 45% provides
enough support
to the back of the case
so over tightening will not warp the case and prevent the front of the
battery compartment
from a possible water
leak on the I and M series Moultrie.
A simple tin rain guard for I and M series Moultrie cams: IR Stealth Option:
A small piece of smoked clear plastic 3
1/2 X 1 1/4 inches set in front of the IR emitters inside the case will
possibly
do two things:
1. Tone down the red glow when camera is
triggered to prevent from someone seeing the camera and spooking game.
2. A well camouflaged camera would still
have the bright white square of IR emitters that would give away its
location to that possible trespasser. Covering up the the emitters in this
matter will help conceal the cam.
We made a similar cover for the Leaf
River IR camera and it worked very well and we did not see any noticeable
amount of loss of IR light in our tests. Our test camera was placed in an
area which had a lot of passing traffic and the camera was never detected.
  |
MFH-DGS-I40 IR Flash 4 MP camera review 06-09-2007 08-14-2007 update: This is another camera that made it to the field without getting its trigger time tested. The field results are very impressive and the more we look at this camera the more we would probably choose this one over its big sister the I60 because we see no need for that tiny view screen and the remote feature has not been needed for way we do our scouting. Being cheaper is also a reason to choose this camera. I have been so totally impressed by the function of the I 60 that I was not really paying much attention to this camera. Just having a black case and basically much of the rest is the same, leaves operational functionality the only issue. Well this camera passed with flying colors. I do not need a 6 MP camera with those large file sizes to do my scouting. I cannot say anything bad about the I 60 because it also works very well but it also costs more. The sleep mode that we kept on looking for is just not there. These cameras will latterly last a couple months on a set of batteries and take thousands of pictures. The I 60 has been out over two months and taken over 3k pictures and 200+ movies and it is still on the hill banging away right now. The I 40 is there, also, just not as long. Picture quality is very good and we can not fault this camera in any way on that point. We have some more rez settings to go through plus the flash and trigger tests to do and we can go on with the battery life testing.
08-19-2007 update: This can came off the hill just long enough to get its trigger time tested (less than 2 seconds) and was put right back out at another rez setting . We are liking about everything about this camera. Both the day and night pictures have good quality. Three things about this cam that are needed, 1st do not tighten the strap to tight when mounting, 2nd build yourself a locking bar for using a Python lock to secure this camera, 3rd cross your fingers and hope that Moultrie gets off their duff and supplies us with a downloadable update to help with the whiteout issue. With all that in place this is going to be one hard camera to beat.
08-20-2007 update: The flash range
testing was done this morning and as with the I-60 this cam proved to
have very good illumination past 40 feet. I was doing the Wildview 5
test at the same time and it was remarkable just how much faster this
camera is on trigger time and delay time. I found the delay time to be a
little less than the advertised 1 minute. Sensing range was out past 35
feet which surprised me because the WV-5 could only see me at 25 feet.
76 degrees and sensing testing makes for some difficult times in most
cases but this cam passed with flying colors.
09-29-2007 update Moultrie whiteout
upgrade M and I series: This past year we have seen where
companies have outsourced their production overseas are starting to
see problems arise. The pre production units seem to work just fine
but when the post production units start to hit the market there
seems to be a margin of difficulties in function that the users are
finding. We do not know that this is the case with the new I and M
series Moultrie’s but it is
suspected. When these cameras hit the market they seemed to be
exactly what many folks were wanting. We really liked all models and
still do but now that we have gotten deep into the testing we see
that the original problems dealing with the whiteout issue has
mushroomed into a new set of difficulties with these cameras. Most
folks felt that it was more of a hardware issue dealing with the
light sensor than a software issue. This may be true but Moultrie
has attempted to correct this through a firmware upgrade. We have
seen a degree of improvement with the I
series but no change with the M series. We cannot exactly duplicate
the light conditions of the pre download, but we can get close. With
the I series we see a definite
improvement in amount of whiteout, but in this process this firmware
update has created another problem. This problem is the lack of
color pictures during good light conditions. It takes some pretty
strong sunlight before this camera will switch to color. On an
average we are seeing color pictures between 11 AM and 4 PM. During
this period we see that the cameras will sometimes switch back and
forth between monochrome and color. We have seen some reports that
some folks feel that the picture quality has also been degraded
somewhat. With our cameras we cannot state this because of the
varying light conditions on the pre and post pictures. Moultrie
engineers have done lots of work creating this download but we feel
that it is still lacking and still has to be tweaked. The M series
is a total disappointment and just has not been fixed. We are still
getting more than 50% whiteout pictures. On one of our M-40’s it
seemed to get worse after the download. What it has come down to is
that both the I and M series cameras must be taken out from under
the forest canopy and put in the bright sun in order to work
properly. Reports that the trigger time was also
affected has not been proven in our tests. We hope that
Moultrie takes notice and does a little more work on these great
cameras.
|
||||||||||||
|
I40 IR flash 4.0 MP (2008 REVISITED) http://www.moultriefeeders.com
|
Moultrie I 40 revisit review 06-15-2008 Well
I just got the data to fill in the above slots for trigger time and
Houston we have a problem Things have gone south with this cam. A
solid 3 second trigger time is what is happening now. That puts this cam
back out in the league of the slower cameras but still fast enough for
some applications as long as you know its speed the cam can be placed so
the slower trigger time will still be effective. This is not the first
time we have done are visit and found that what was a fact originally is
now gone to hell in a hand basket. These areas are not constantly
checked by the receiving folks that supply us and the factory folks will
slip some stuff into the system thinking they will not be caught. Well
they just got caught. 06-29-2008 update: The reports just keep on coming about this cam. More and more we are hearing the same about the three plus second trigger times. Now comes the next issue involving this camera. (See examples) This camera will run well into the morning (9 to 10 O clock) with out ever switching to color. This is happening every day. We have tested many cameras here including some of our original I 40s and they had some whiteout issues early on but still switched over at the correct time. Right now I am going to have to say that I would have a very hard time recommending the 08 I-40 camera. If you should be one of the lucky 07 camera holders and it is working without issues, hold on to it because that has proven to be a great camera. The $ 200 camera shootout that was planned will probably not happen because one other of the contestants failed miserably with the trigger time tests and now has a battery problem. That leaves the Scoutguard sg550 that seems to be getting on in the field just fine.
|
||||||||||||
|
I60 IR flash 6.0 MP (2007) http://www.moultriefeeders.com
Security: I made a 7 ½ X ¾ X 1/8 inch bar (see picture) and drilled a hole in each end to slip a Python cable through and it appears that this will work just fine for most security situations:
Side view with battery plate removed.
SD card and accessories cables plug in here:
1/2 inch piece of 2X4
cut to a length of 4 3/4 inches and beveled on the end to 45% provides
enough support
to the back of the case
so over tightening will not warp the case and prevent the front of the
battery compartment
from a possible water
leak on the I and M series Moultrie.
A simple tin rain guard for I and M series Moultrie cams: IR Stealth Option:
A small piece of smoked clear plastic 3
1/2 X 1 1/4 inches set in front of the IR emitters inside the case will
possibly
do two things:
1. Tone down the red glow when camera is
triggered to prevent from someone seeing the camera and spooking game.
2. A well camouflaged camera would still
have the bright white square of IR emitters that would give away its
location to that possible trespasser. Covering up the the emitters in this
matter will help conceal the cam.
We made a similar cover for the Leaf
River IR camera and it worked very well and we did not see any noticeable
amount of loss of IR light in our tests. Our test camera was placed in an
area which had a lot of passing traffic and the camera was never detected.
|
5-26-2007:
First look at the new Moultrie I 60 IR flash 6.0 MP with on
board viewer. This is a very impressive looking camera and new for this year
they have chosen to do a all new case design. The
massive IR array appears to be of single focus compared to the Leaf River
array which uses different focus IR emitters in their arrays. This 72 count
array should do a good job in the illumination area and is advertised as
being good to 50 feet. Our tests will take a close look at this. This camera
can be set up in any one of 4 resolutions from VGA up to 6.0. New for this
year Moultrie has included a built in viewer for those folks who wish to see
the results of the cameras performance in the field. I want to take a close
look at the color day and IR night functions of this camera because it
appears it is being done through one lens. This may incorporate a mechanical
filter to accomplish this task. It will be interesting to put it to task in
the field. Pictures will be stamped with the standard time and date along
with temperature, moon phase and barometric pressure. External power port is
also incorporated which is a big plus and this can also be used with the not
yet available solar panel which is suppose to maintain six rechargeable D
cells if you chose to go that route. Moultrie advertises this camera as
being able to perform up to
150 days on 6 good alkaline batteries which is some very good news. Grape
vine has it that this is accomplished by having the camera to go into a
sleep mode with a 1 to 2 second wakeup time then the camera will go into the
instant trigger time mode. This is one of the areas that
seems to be of great interest to a lot of folks so we will be paying
close attention to this detail.
06-09-2007
Update: The OD green case measures
about 11 inches tall and is 6 ½ wide with a depth of about 4 inches. A
single thumb screw will open the case that is hinged in the top. This
front cover has some sort of detent built into the hinge to hold it in
the open position for programming. The right side of the case has a
removable cover 5 ½ by 2 ½ inches that is
held on by two more thumb screws. Under this cover is the battery
compartment which has a hinged retainer for the batteries which also has
another thumb screw. Programming is very much like all the older models and is easy and
straight forward. Playing around in the yard with my wife’s flowers in the
background proved that this cameras daytime pictures on the low setting
produced very sharp and clear pictures. When we did a quick check of the
trigger time in a dark hallway we concluded that this camera is pretty
fast. This was judged buy seeing how quick the IR array came on and not
by the clock. We found on a previously tested camera that just because
the IR array was on that did not mean the picture was being taken during
the first micro seconds of the flash. This will be done in front of our
testing clock soon. Because of this narrow access to the SD card I had
on two occasions failed to have the card fully seated and after
extensive testing I had to access the internal memory in order to view
the results. Care must be taken when putting the card in and insure it
is seated all the way in. 06-17-2007 update: Before and after tests using this cover showed that the IR light was noticeably decreased on the Moultrie but was not as noticeable on the Leaf river. Flash was still good past 30 feet but the background foliage was very dark. It would still be a good idea to use this when a higher degree of camera concealment is needed. (see comparison photos below) 07-13-2007 I-60 remote feature: To test the remote function of the I-60 I went into the program and selected handheld and remote. I set the cam on a stand watching a small fountain on my back deck just outside the sliding glass doors. During the hot afternoon sun the finches really like to come and take a bath. As they would arrive I would hit the capture button and the picture would be taken. I then selected 15 second movie and put it back on PIR just to see if the camera would see the birds and trigger a movie. Well, it worked great. I was assuming that the movement of the water would also trigger the cam but it did not. This widens the use of this great camera. You bird watchers need to go to the local sporting goods store and ask for a Moultrie I-60 and get yourself set up for some great fun |
