|
Timber Eye / Remington Ghost Camera Review Page |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
Timber Eye THx5.0 IR Battery Holder: SD Card with Trojan:
|
Please note: The review below is of the original model we purchased. Following the original review is the updated review (REVISITED) that we started some weeks later after getting updated cameras from the manufacturer. Timber Eye (or Remington Ghost) THx5.0 IR (red)/white flash review 06-11-2008 Way back when I first began to see a little data on this cam I began to track down the source. This is a company down in Texas and I made several calls to them to try to find out more and all about the availability of this camera. They basically blew me off and would not give me any information. Later I found that Cabelas was going to handle this product so I placed an order which got delayed by more than a month. Well yesterday to my surprise the thing showed up at my door along with several other cameras from different places. I pulled it out of the box and my expectations for this $115 camera were pretty low. My expectations were not very high but I was totally impressed by the vast array of features stuck in a low cost cam. Both red and white flash, movie, three delays from 30 seconds to 2 min. and having a 5 MP ratting. It came with a lock, card, adjustable mounting bracket, and cable to hang it on the tree. The instructions were some of the best I have seen written. Of the several cams I had to play with I chose this one to just get a feel how it was going to do. The programming was super. From then is when everything just went to hell. The cam would not work in the IR position, would not work in the movie position, appeared to corrupt the card which required re formatting, and in the USB setup it locks up my computer. So its back in the box on its way back to Cabelas and the folks in Texas need to go back to the drawing board. I will get a replacement but as of now I would run like hell if someone tried to give you one of these cameras.
06-29-2008 update: Our
replacement has not arrived but I have spent a good amount of
time searching the outdoor forums looking for any data that is
out on this camera. It has been mostly negative with the
exception of a couple reviews that are on the Cabelas site. They
both state that this is just the best camera that ever was
produced. It is very strange but both of these reviewers are
just down the road from the suppliers. Could it be they got
something the rest of the folks didn’t? very strange.
07-10-2008 update: Cabelas
managed to accept the return and get another cam back to me
and it arrived just a short while ago. This one out of the
box would not work at all. The plastic casting on this cam
is very crude and things just do not line up as expected.
The battery holder has shoulders that are high enough to
keep the positive end of the battery from hitting the plate.
I found this after determining that the cells were just fine
so something else must be wrong. One of the cells shoulder
would hit the crude plastic area holding the contact plate
in place and keep it from making contact. I slipped a penny
in the space and the cam came on. Programming was a snap, I
chose IR single and I was ready for a quick operational
check. I installed the 256 card that came with the cam and
fired it up and put in the testing lane. I watched the front
of the cam and when the lights all went out I triggered the
can and the IR array came alive. I repeated this several
times and shut it down and pulled the card. This is where
everything went south in a hurry. My computer lit up like
the forth of July and Norton went into full swing.
There was a Trojan Horse (virus) on
that card. I was able to clear the damage and
cleaned the card.
I did a quick trigger time and in the incandescent mode it was over two seconds. This cam is just about as non functional as you can get. Remington should tie a knot in someone’s private parts over this mistake. They have there name on the clone of this cam. I stated before that you should run like hell if some one tried to give you one of these, well I mean it. This concludes this review and please do not ever send me another one of these to review.
07-29-2008 update: This
morning when I made my run through the many outdoor forums
that I screen for camera issues I came across an interesting
bit of information in relation to this camera. We did not
test for this our selves but it was stated that because of
our review on this cam, one of the new owners scanned the SD
card and found no virus on the card but when he scanned the
enclosed CD that came with the camera it had a virus on it.
So now we will have
two areas to look at if we ever get hold of another one of
these cameras.
08-11-2008 update: This
update is just going to deal with what I have picked off
our forum and other out door forums. We had one fellow
who had read our warning about these cams having in some
cases a virus on the card and CD that came with the
camera. Well this fellow went out of his way and called
their customer service which told him that all the
information that he was reading on the internet was
wrong and that there was no issues with the camera. He
then fielded the camera for a week and when he pulled
the card to see his pictures his computer immediately
was infected with the Trojan virus that we had warned
about. Further check also found that the disk that came
with the camera was also infected and resulted in a
cleaning operation on his computer. We also had another
fellow who was testing the Ghost in a manner similar to
our tests and he found that his unit also ceased to work
in the exact same manner as all cameras we have tested
to date. The IR flash goes out of sync with the shutter
resulting black night pictures and movies. This issue is
the predominate issue and has been reported many times
on the forums. If anyone receives a report from their
customer service stating that what we have reported is
not valid please mail Anthony or me with the time/date
that the phone conversation took place and to whom you
have spoken and the number that was used to contact that
individual. This type of failure notification should be
of great value to those who are trying to sell this
product and to the consumer who is putting out their
hard earned money to purchase their product. If this
product had flown without issue we would have reported
the exact facts as strongly as we report the negative
issues.
08-13-2008 update: We were asked to remove the warning about the virus because some percentage of the first lot of cams were supposedly the only ones shipped with this issue. Well we just received another verification of a card and disk being infected and was transferred to the owners computer. The process of cleaning this off the computer is not fun. This issue about the virus was presented to the folks in Texas (Wild Game Innovations) and asked about a recall. They felt that being the fact that the percentage of infected camera’s was small they would not deal with a recall. They said they would give a new card to anyone who got infected. They also stated that they felt that all infected cameras have already been purchased. Well we know as of day before yesterday that was not true. Now let’s say you were one of the unlucky folks that got infected and had to spend the time to clean your computer or pay some one to come and do it for you. You now have a clean card and a clean computer and life goes on less a few coins from the old wallet and you can re deploy the cam. Every thing is now back to normal, maybe, how about the fellow who did not have virus protection or it was out dated and did not catch the Trojan? He is now open to the net and can have his computer cruised by those sorry SOB’s who put the virus on the card. Again I will say, if you have one of these cameras and want to keep it, clean the card before using it and do not run the disk unless you check it also. If you do not have proper virus protection on your computer just do not use this camera or use a known good card or return it for a replacement from another company or get your money back. I wonder what would happen if someone suffered a serious case of identity fraud and lost a ton of money and it ruined their credit? Would a recall be in order?
|
|||||||||||
|
Remington Ghost CAMO (purchased from Academy Sports)
$2 security fix for Academy
Sports Remington Ghost with the use of Python cable: |
Please note: The review below is of the original model we purchased. Following the original review is the update review that we started some weeks later after getting updated cameras from the manufacturer. Academy Sports Remington camo Ghost Red/white flash 5 MP camera 08-07-2008
Ghost; The soul of something dead
believed to be an inhabitant of the unseen world or to appear in the form of
that object. 08-08-2008 update: Checked the cam this morning after being turned off over night and found that the date/time does not advance with the power turned off. You must reset the time/date every time you turn the camera on just before deploying it. This would probably be a real hassle on most cameras but this camera has super simple programming that is easy to do before closing the door and walking off.
08-09-2008 update: Made the short trip to get this cam over to Anthony to get the trigger tests done and move it out to the testing area for some sample pictures. This was a very strange situation. While doing the trigger time tests, Anthony noticed something floating off and disappearing. Well it was the soul of yet another Wildgame Innovations camera that just died. We now know why they chose the Ghost name this model. We have given an extreme amount of time to this camera in hopes that the supplier to all these retailers would settle down and get things fixed. We would not recommend this camera to anyone. Let’s see what comes out of the clouds next year from that company. They certainly drew from the toilet this year. These folks do such a good job with their other products lets hope they get hold of this blunder and get it fixed and bring it up to the standard of the other products they sell.
08-11-2008 update: This update is just
going to deal with what I have picked off our forum and other out door
forums. We had one fellow who had read our warning about these cams
having in some cases a virus on the card and CD that came with the
camera. Well this fellow went out of his way and called their customer
service which told him that all the information that he was reading on
the internet was wrong and that there was no issues with the camera. He
then fielded the camera for a week and when he pulled the card to see
his pictures his computer immediately was infected with the Trojan virus
that we had warned about. Further check also found that the disk that
came with the camera was also infected and resulted in a cleaning
operation on his computer. We also had another fellow who was testing
the Ghost in a manner similar to our tests and he found that his unit
also ceased to work in the exact same manner as all cameras we have
tested to date. The IR flash goes out of sync with the shutter resulting
black night pictures and movies. This issue is the predominate issue and
has been reported many times on the forums. If anyone receives a report
from their customer service stating that what we have reported is not
valid please mail Anthony or me with the time/date that the phone
conversation took place and to whom you have spoken and the number that
was used to contact that individual. This type of failure notification
should be of great value to those who are trying to sell this product
and to the consumer who is putting out their hard earned money to
purchase their product. If this product had flown without issue we would
have reported the exact facts as strongly as we report the negative
issues. 09-04-2008 update: Spent a lot of time scanning again and trying to see if there has been any improvement since the last report. Well the answer is a definite no but the report coming from the field from the many dissatisfied owners who took the number off the box and called to complain found: “Well maybe there is an update in the wind”. Short of throwing away all previously manufactured cams and replacing those with a new functional camera would be the only upgrade that folks should accept. This review is closed.
|
|||||||||||
|
Battery Holder mods: |
Revisit Remington Ghost/Timber Eye dual flash (red/white) digital camera review 09-12-2008 We kind of think that the folks across the pond threw this company a curve when they originally shipped both models of this camera. We found some serious issues and after having seven failures we had given up. Well this company didn’t give up and went to work. They did not correct things like the clock not advancing in the off position. So it is very important that if you take this cam to the field in the off position you must set the date/time at the tree after it is turned on. My first check when both the Remington and TI came out of the box was to see if the battery holder would accept Energizer batteries and power up. If you look at the picture on the sidebar you can see that the plastic that hit the shoulder of the battery on all previously tested units has been milled off and this allows the positive end of the cell to rest against the plate. This is most definitely an improvement and the cam fired right up. To know if you have an updated battery holder you should compare the plastic shoulders that hold the bottom left plate for thickness. If the left shoulder (pos. end of first cell) is about half the thickness as the negative end of the 2nd cell then it is upgraded. The next way to tell is set up your cam in the on position and select still/incandescent. Then you switch the cam from still to movie and the incandescent will switch to LED. They also changed the automatic time (not selectable) that the IR flash will work. This setting is 5 PM to 7 AM which covers most of the low light conditions for this time of year. Let’s hope we do not get that dreaded whiteout during the transition of day to evening and morning to daylight. A quick check of trigger times this morning on both units showed about a 2 second time (unofficial). There was another pleasant surprise with both of these cameras. This is a very warm morning and humid 75 degrees. The sensing range caught me at 50 feet every time I would move. Well so far both cams have operated without issue, let’s hope they stay that way. This has been a double function review with two exact cams being tested at the same time. Flash range was tested on both in IR only because we could not get that last time. We found both good out to past 40 feet but experienced a lot of IR burn on close objects. Being the market is somewhat starved for functional low priced white flash cameras, since the cudde capture has fallen off the edge of the earth. That is where this camera has a real good chance. Now the only cam that is in competition is the I-590 Stealth which is very functional but has a slower trigger time. We are very happy that this thing is starting to fly in the right direction. We will grab some deep woods 50 ft flash tests then see about getting some sample pictures and movies in both the flash configurations. Anthony will also re do the trigger times on both of these cameras to get the official times. I do not have to go over the programming because all that was covered in the first reviews. It is off to the hill and try to get all the great pictures that folks need to see. Out thoughts this morning are also about the folks in the camera companies that are in Texas and our friends near the gulf with the big storm bearing down. We wish them the best and hope that they and their families are safe. 09-13-2008 update: One thing that I forgot to mention is that the issue with the thumbnails being black when windows opened up from the card. This has been corrected and works as normal. 09-16-2008 update: Both cameras have managed to hang in there and capture pictures. Remington (this update) when set to color white flash are nearly mono chrome as far as color in the pictures. Even though there is a lack of color the pictures show a degree of sharpness and detail. In the IR flash the range is fairly short but does work and again the pictures are pretty good when the animal is in the main flash. The sensing seems to be very good and even though it is narrow it did capture 850 pictures in two days. The main and somewhat serious problem that we see now with this camera is the fixed times for IR flash. It is difficult to pick days that have the transition from day to night and back to day at the 5 in the morning and 7 at night timeframe. We got about two hours of whiteout pictures on this cam during the transition. This just happens to be the main time that folks want to see what is moving. Bushnell is built on the same design and both share the same image sensor. Bushnell has a means to program the start/stop times so that the flash closely matches the current time of year. The main thing that I must stress is this camera does work and if it wasn’t for a couple of issues they would be falling off the shelf to consumers. We are going to keep on working with these two cameras and see if we can figure out just the best way to deploy these cameras. When set to the color white flash mode we got very little color in the pictures except for a slight amount at night with flash. The daylight sensor We are trying to figure out when this cam is in the color white flash mode is the transition controlled by a light sensor or is it still being controlled by the fixed times. We have not yet pulled the card on the Timber Eye and it has been set to the IR red flash mode. Being both cams are the same we can run parallel tests in both modes. The next update will be dealing with the TI in IR. 09-17-2008 update: We got out to the Timber Eye cam and pulled the card and it is also plagued with whiteout and black out problems. Though there is a definite lack of color the daytime pictures are pretty good once you get past that period when the cam is trying to figure out if it is day time or night. The IR pictures are good also as long as the animal is in the main flash splash. Again this cam does work but has that transition issue as did the Remington. Movies are next. 09-19-2008 update: We have had another few days and both cameras are still working and we were able to capture some movies but the black out thing followed us over here to. In the mornings after 7 AM until there is enough light all the movies were black. Once there was enough light the camera started to take readable videos. The 320X240 is fixed and the frame rate is 7.5. This camera is like a low dollar point and shoot camera that has no adjustments, everything is fixed and you have to live with how it operates because you do not have the option to change anything except the modes. The IR mode is the only mode of operation on this camera that functioned fairly well. The mono day/night pictures gave enough detail for trail operations with the exception of that fixed flash on off situation which caused the loss of pictures during a very critical time of day. We do see an improvement over the first 7 cameras we had our hands on. These two cameras do work but have some areas that need to be changed and I feel by this time next year we will see a better version. Off to the big woods for some field operations.
|
|||||||||||
|
TimberView |
Timberview
1.3 MP white flash camera review 10-30-2008 This is the little brother to the other Wildgame innovations cameras. The Timber eye and the Remington Ghost are the same cameras with a different name on the front. As with the Cudde Capture this is a very basic camera that only takes pictures and no movies. It is programmable as far as time and date plus the delay period. You can also select day only, night only, and 24 hour operations. Out of the box this camera would not work. I messed with it an hour and finally it did come on but I am unable to turn it off with the switch. I have to lift a battery to do that. This will probably change once we get some use on the buttons. The size is about 8 inches tall and 7 inches wide and about two and a half inches thick. This camera operates off of 4 C sized cells and they are in small slots under the front cover on each side of the camera. There is a set of switches and a small LCD screen and a SD card slot. The cost at Walmart is $50 and it only comes with a couple small bungee cords and nothing else. My first in house test showed that this camera does work and will take pictures. My first pictures were about the same quality as the Predator Xtinction’s pictures. This leaves something to be desired but you can tell what is in the picture but is somewhat fuzzy around the edges. I am headed outside to get some full sun shots and then see if anything improves. The pictures in full sun were not so bad and showed pretty good color. Next I ran through a series of trigger time tests and they all came out just under two seconds. This is not as fast as the Capture but it is also less than half price. The minimum delay is 30 seconds and this can be increased to one and two minutes. As with its predecessors this camera’s clock stops with the power off and so there is a need to set the time date at the tree when deploying. I did a quick sensing distance and was surprised that it would pick me up at 80 feet most every time I passed and this was done during the daytime with a temperature of 61 degrees. Looks like this camera might have a place on a tree for a while on the hill. I will try to get the flash range done in the morning. Spent some more time screwing with the on off switch and it is working somewhat now. We will see if it clears up all the way further into the review. 10-31-2008 update: Made it through the flash range tests and it showed that this cam is good past 40 feet. The main switch is still giving a little problem but it seems to be getting better. At 41 degrees this morning I could trigger the cam at 50 feet by just waving my hand. The sensing zone is narrow like what Cuddeback uses. So far this camera has been doing things pretty good for a fifty dollar camera. The flash range tests still show that Predator cam quality, but acceptable for most applications where you do not need a big degree of detail of an animal out past 50 feet. We will get this cam on the hill and see how it does against the big fuzzy brown critters. 11-06-2008 update: This little camera operates off 4 C cells and our first set was installed on 10-30-08 and the batteries failed on 11-5-08 and it had taken 174 pictures. This is only one week on a set of batteries. A good portion of these pictures were at night with flash. We have been favorably impressed with how well the pictures looked. We do remember it is a basic camera but seems to do well in that respect. Battery life sucks though. We will try a set of NiMH batteries and try it again. Then try a set of Lithium cells and see if they do better. 11-16-2008 update: We ran this last week (7days) and 194 pictures on 4000 mAh NiMH rechargables. This means that it seems to last as long on rechargeables as it does on standard Energizers. And the picture count is about the same. This would probably be a pretty decent camera if we could get a couple weeks battery life because the other function is very acceptable for the price.
|
|||||||||||
|
|