Thoughts from the Engineer

    July 12, 2006

2 Camera Test:  Cuddeback 3.0 vs 2006 Bushnell 2.1 Trail Sentry [11-9200] 

This report is not intended to "blow anyone's skirt up". These are the facts as it happened. The new Bushnell 2.1 took a total of 155 pictures of deer in four days while the Cudde 3.0 took a total of 41 pictures. Reviewing the times showed us that while the animals were present the Cudde would only take one or two  pictures and the Bushnell would continue to take pictures as long as the animals were present. The Cudde was able to sense animals at a greater distance which the Bushnell did not see. The only non deer pictures were of a dog running through the area which the Cudde picked up but the Bushnell did not. The detection zone of the Bushnell is much wider than the Cudde. Conclusion is that for $150 the little Bushnell is going to be hard to beat. Cudde saga continues as we plan to put Cudde against Cudde in a three camera test using the 1.3, 3.0, and the 06 Expert.

Bill